Christ’s Lane Action Group (CLAG)
The press coverage so far
From the BBC to Varsity, the Cambridge Independent to The Critic, the press and the heritage world have covered the fight over Christ’s Lane. The headlines have warned of a bulky, four-storey mega-development that would turn one of Cambridge’s busiest lanes into a canyon, and of the years of disruption to come. Read the coverage to date below. And now The Architects’ Journal has taken the row national.
Featured coverage
The Architects’ Journal: “Planning row erupts over Grafton’s Cambridge library job”
The AJ takes the row national: the judicial review, the consent order quashing the first permission on all four grounds, and the court’s refusal to be hurried. The College says it was “forced to submit” a second application; its own planning agent concedes “the material submitted is almost entirely the same”.
Open documentCambridge Independent
The city’s own paper reports on the fight to stop the scheme and the planning row it has triggered.
Open documentThe Critic
“Should new buildings make Cambridge better or worse?” Commentary in The Critic Magazine.
Open documentThe Victorian Society: the harm it warned the College how to avoid
The Victorian Society didn’t simply warn of harm. Taking its cue from Bodley’s Gothic Revival, it set out detailed changes that would ease the new library’s bulk, and the College pressed on regardless.
Open documentIn the Media
- Planning row erupts over Grafton’s Cambridge library jobThe AJ reports the judicial review, the consent order quashing the first permission on all four grounds, and the court’s refusal to let the College hurry it. The College says it was “forced to submit” the second application “because of the delay caused by the judicial review brought by CLAG”; its own planning agent concedes “the material submitted is almost entirely the same”. The second application “could go before the planning committee in September”. An archived copy of the article as published (image) is saved here.
- Letters: CLAG and Create Streets answer Rowan MooreCLAG’s letter, published in full: “Rowan Moore reviewed the architecture and buried the law.” The “first round” he told readers CLAG had won is the College’s own account of a case it has in fact agreed should be quashed on all four grounds, with residents’ costs paid. The founders of Create Streets write alongside: Cambridge “deserves buildings that meet their brief and enrich the city… The present design has not achieved either.” An archived copy of the letters as published (PDF) is saved here.
- In Cambridge, it’s town v gown over rival plans for a college libraryRowan Moore’s architecture column on the dispute. CLAG published a fact check setting five of the article’s factual statements beside the primary documents; The Observer has since corrected the article online.
- Cambridge college library ‘slowly falling down’Roger Hepher of CLAG calls the design ‘unnecessarily tall, bland and uninviting’ and significantly more massive than the previously approved scheme.
- Local group objects to ‘bulky’ new Christ’s libraryCLAG launches its objection, citing Historic England’s finding of harm from the building’s excessive bulk.
- News in Brief: Christ’s ‘canyon’CLAG says the design is ‘too large’ and could turn Christ’s Lane into a ‘canyon.’
- New Christ’s library approvedCouncillors approve the scheme; CLAG responds: ‘This isn’t the end … the planning process may be broken, but our resolve is not.’
- Should new buildings make Cambridge better or worse?Commentary arguing the scheme is overscaled and would harm the historic setting.
- Christ’s Lane CampaignThe Museum of Cambridge’s record of the scheme and the campaign against it, including CLAG.
- Christ’s College Library: critical review and alternative design proposalIndependent review setting out a viable, lower-bulk alternative design (PDF).
- College accused of a ‘four-storey mega-development’Objectors say the scheme is an oversized ‘mega-development’ that narrows Christ’s Lane.
- Plans to demolish and rebuild a 1970s library as a four-storey ‘mega-development’Objectors warn of lasting harm from the building’s scale and bulk.
- Concern over plans to narrow Christ’s Lane for two yearsConcern over the years of disruption and the narrowing of Christ’s Lane during construction.
Object Now
Same Scheme, Same Harm Called A Benefit: the scheme is back. The Council accepts comments until the application is decided. Make your objection count, quote reference 26/02109/FUL.
Email objections to Dominic.Bush@greatercambridgeplanning.org quoting ref. 26/02109/FUL.

