Site index

Sitemap

Every page and document on this site, in one place. Use it to find the primary court and planning documents behind the campaign, or to jump straight to any section.

Main pages

  • HomeThe campaign overview: the judicial review, the second application, heritage, daylight and how to object.
  • NewsThe saga, chronicled beat by beat: the resubmission, the latest twists, and CLAG’s newsletters.
  • The Second ApplicationHow the College resubmitted the conceded scheme unfixed and pitched it as unchanged: the covering statement, the Bursar’s email, the refused public Forum and the open meeting.
  • Heritage HarmWhat Historic England, the Victorian Society and Alec Forshaw each found: harm caused by the building’s size, bulk and massing.
  • The Fact CheckThe College’s public statements set beside the primary court and planning documents, and the correction The Observer made after CLAG’s fact check.
  • Observer Fact Check (archived)CLAG’s fact check of The Observer’s 5 July 2026 column, preserved unchanged after the article was corrected online.
  • Sign the PetitionAdd your name and object to application 26/02109/FUL.
  • PressWhat the media has reported about Christ’s Lane and application 26/02109/FUL.
  • Cambridge ObjectsObjections on the public record from residents, heritage bodies and civic voices.
  • FAQAnswers to common questions about the scheme, the judicial review and how to take part.

Homepage sections

Document library

The primary sources behind the campaign, grouped by theme. Each opens a readable page with a link to the original PDF.

Judicial Review

The Second Application

Heritage Harm

Daylight & Sunlight

Newsletters