On Tuesday 20 October 2026 the High Court quashed the Council’s first permission for the Christ’s College library, of 7 November 2025, on all four grounds of our claim.

The consultees

The Gardens Trust, 6 July 2026

PDF · 2 pages · Primary source · The text below is the PDF’s own text, page by page

The Gardens Trust’s comment form of 6 July 2026 (2 pages; register document 9453295).

Download the original PDF · Back to Documents

The document in full

Open the original PDF

Page 1

Comments for Planning Application 26/02109/FUL Application Summary Application Number: 26/02109/FUL Address: Christs College Library Christs College St Andrews Street Cambridge Cambridgeshire Proposal: Demolition of 1970s library and replacement with new library, social and study spaces including re-provision of bridge to the Bodley Library. Alterations to kitchen, Upper Hall and adjacent areas including new plant, access improvements and alterations to wc, provision in the south east range of Second Court. Re-landscaping of Bath Court and ancillary works, installation of temporary kitchen and dining facility in Second Court for the duration of the works. Case Officer: Dominic Bush Customer Details Name: Not Available Address: The Gardens Trust 70 Cowcross Street London EC1M 6EJ Comment Details Commenter Type: Consultee Stance: Customer made comments neither objecting to or supporting the Planning Application Comment Reasons: Comment:Dear Sir/Madam, We are grateful for the opportunity to comment on this application, which has a material impact on the significance of Christ's College (Grade II). The inclusion of this site on the statutory register requires great weight to be given to their conservation. We have considered the information that you have provided and on the basis of this do not wish to comment on the proposals at this stage. We would however emphasise that this does not in any way signify either our approval or disapproval of the proposals. We wish to outline the reasons that we do not wish to comments on the proposals below. The development is not situated in, or visible from, the main historic registered gardens of the college, although it is included within the registered area. It is situated in Bath Court, which is a small, narrow space between the outer south-east wall of First Court (unaffected) and the 1974 library, which is to be demolished and replaced. There is no heritage, visual, amenity or other merit in the 1970s library building. The Bath Court space is of low value to the Registered Park and Garden (RPG) and of the college as a whole. Its only landscaping is a single Chusan palm tree (Trachycarpus

Page 2

fortunei), thought to have been planted in the 1950s. We are glad to see this is to remain and be protected during construction works. It has no historical value or associations. Bath Court has, since the first building of the college in the 16th century, always been an ancillary area of the college. It is a small, narrow space that has served variously as a kitchen garden, tennis court, bath house, college boilers, lecture hall and temporary dining room. The proposed development would give the open area of the Court a 'walled garden' feel, with paving, seating and limited new planting. This would be an improvement on its current appearance and use. The ground level footprint of the new building is no larger than that of the existing building to be demolished, although the proposed upper floors would oversail the ground floor to overhang the Court to a certain extent. Given the Court's historic and current uses and appearance this would not cause serious harm to the Court's low value as part of the RPG. An Arboricultural Impact Assessment by Ligna concludes that the arboricultural impact of the development would be negligible. The main trees to be protected both during and after building works are the Chusan Palm in Bath Court and those in Second Court, where temporary kitchens are proposed during the works. Based on this assessment, we therefore have no comments to make on the proposal. However, if you have any further queries, please contact us at this email address, and we would be grateful to be advised of the outcome of the application in due course. Yours faithfully Daniel Bowles Conservation Officer

Open the original PDF

The first permission is quashed. The second is frozen.

On Tuesday 20 October 2026 the High Court quashed the first approval, 25/02161/FUL, on all four grounds of our claim. The Secretary of State has frozen the permission. On 13 October she directed the Council not to grant it without her authorisation while she considers whether to call the application in, six days after the identical application 26/02109/FUL was controversially approved. If you would like to support a call in, write to us and we will tell you how.

Email residents@christs-lane.com.

Join the mailing list Where things stand